Tags: Research Paper On Fast FoodEffects Of Bullying EssayChristology Essay Jesus RealityPersuasive Research Paper OutlineAn Essay On Marriage Versus Living TogetherSome Examples Of Research ProposalsFree Term PaperBest Font For Term PapersWorld Peace & Nonviolence EssayGeorge Orwell Essay On Tea
As educator, the teacher-researcher was motivated to conduct this action research on the effectiveness of DI in teaching English on Grade Four pupils for a week-long lesson. What is the performance of the two groups of respondents in the posttest? This action research utilized the experimental design since its main purpose was to determine the effectiveness of DI and its possible effect to the mean gain scores on achievement of pupils on a one-week lesson in Grade 4 English.
Anderson (2007) noted that it is imperative not to exclude any child in a classroom, so a differentiated learning environment must be provided by a teacher.
Differentiated instruction is based on the concept that the teacher is a facilitator of information, while students take the primary role of expanding their knowledge by making sense of their ability to learn differently (Robinson, Maldonado, & Whaley, 2014).
Speaking includes skills in using the language expressions and grammatical structures correctly in oral communication while writing skill includes readiness skills, mechanics in guided writing, functional and creative writing (K to 12 Curriculum Guide for Grade 4).
The K to 12 Basic Education Curriculum aims to help learners understand that English language is involved in the dynamic social process which responds to and reflects changing social conditions.
Diagnostic scores reveal that the control group has a mean of 11.76 (Sd=4.06) while the experimental group reported a mean score of 12.07 (sd=3.56) which is a little higher.
Table 1Pretest Results of the Control and the Experimental Groups Prior to the Experiment The variance results of 4.06 and 3.56 are not that big which signify that both classes are heterogeneous; meaning the pupils were of differing level of intelligence.
The mean and the standard deviation were used to determine the level of performance of control and experimental groups and the classification of pupils, while the t-test was employed to determine the significant difference of the mean scores on pretest and posttest of both groups.
The following are the results and the analysis done from the data. Performance of the Two Groups of Respondents in the Diagnostic Test (Pretest)The result of the pretest of the two class groups is presented in Table 1.