Tags: Creative Writing Courses In NycSat Essay Score RangeTv Violence And Kids EssaysHow To Write A Criticism PaperBest College EssaysImportance Of Food Safety And Sanitation EssayEssays On Mama Day
), he was defining "underrated" according to the choices of those who responded to his site.
Doesn't the existence of such a list illustrate the flaw in this method?
) I appreciate that he at least pointed out that my program was in his respondents' top 50 picks, but referring to those responses as "the national rankings" is a terribly overblown way of putting it. News & World Reports rankings--also a poll--that he dismisses at great length?
(I brought up credentials, by the way, because you advertise yours in every possible context.) ***** I've followed your online arguments enough to see you once in a while concede a point to someone who disagrees with you, but when you do, it's usually a relatively trivial point.
Thus, it's unfair of you to claim that I'm the one who can't be persuaded (I conceded something rather significant to you once, actually--I still have the email in which I did so, in fact).
(I wonder how many people actually read the extraordinarily long-winded explanation of the "methods" behind this supposed ranking system?
I've read shorter "methods" sections in legitimate scientific journal articles.) ***** 2) He also persists in referring to this poll as "the national rankings." When he listed the program where I earned my MFA as one of the "top twenty-five underrated" programs (along with the University of Florida!Frequently Asked Questions About the Rankings Additional Rankings of Full-Residencies I have three main objections to Seth Abramson's so-called rankings, but I'll address only two of those objections here: ***** 1) Seth has defended these rankings based, in part, on the "reasonable" assumption that prospective MFA applicants have seriously researched a number of MFA programs (he hasn't, as far as I'm aware, said what that number is).Without offering any empirical evidence about the prospective MFA students who respond to his blog site, he has no choice but to make an assumption about those respondents--no choice, anyway, if we're to take the "rankings" as being at all accurate.**** In short: We shouldn't assume that this small number of respondents is especially well informed about their choices or that their choices aren't affected by factors other than quality (e.g., location), and neither should Poets & Writers.I don't have much time to devote to this topic over the next few days, but I feel I need to say SOMETHING for the moment: I'm supposed to be persuaded by your argument above, Seth? Our most recent coverage of MFA programs is available in the September/October 2017 issue, including 2018 MFA Index: A Guide to More Than 200 Programs.In it, we offer a look at 153 full-residency programs and 59 low-residency programs, sorted alphabetically by region.I know for certain that some people won't post comments about anything you've said or written for the same reason I nearly didn't.***** Speaking of graciousness: There's something magnanimous about stepping back and allowing people to publicly disagree with your frequent and widely disseminated writings without your repeatedly defending yourself.(no data available) indicates teaching load is unknown, Light (an average of two courses or fewer to teach per academic year), Average (an average of three courses to teach per academic year), Heavy (an average of four courses or more to teach per academic year); GRE Required: * (GRE scores required of applicants with an undergraduate GPA below 3.0), ** (GRE subject test is also preferred or required), *** (scores required only from applicants seeking funding); Cross-genre: (genre availability may be limited by program).Read more information about the methodology used to determine the rankings and check out the rankings of the remaining eighty-one full-residency MFA programs.